Argumentation Profiles

نویسندگان

چکیده

An argumentation profile is defined as a methodological instrument for analyzing argumentative discourse considering distinct and interrelated dimensions: the types of argument used, their quality, emotions triggered. Walton’s theoretical contributions are developed coherent analytical multifaceted toolbox capturing these aspects. Argumentation schemes used to detect quantify argument. Fallacy analysis assessment implicit premises retrieved through allow evaluating arguments. Finally, frequency emotive words signals most common aroused. This method illustrated corpus tweets three politicians.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

Different agents may have different points of view. This can be modelled using different abstract argumentation frameworks, each consisting of a set of arguments and a binary attack-relation between them. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a profile of argumentation frameworks is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentatio...

متن کامل

Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Extended Abstract

We review a recently introduced model in which each of a number of agents is endowed with an abstract argumentation framework reflecting her individual views regarding a given set of arguments. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a situation is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentation framework is induced by a combinati...

متن کامل

Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Characterisation and Complexity

Different agents may have different points of view. Following a popular approach in the artificial intelligence literature, this can be modelled by means of different abstract argumentation frameworks, each consisting of a set of arguments the agent is contemplating and a binary attack-relation between them. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a...

متن کامل

Assumption-Based Argumentation Translated to Argumentation Frameworks

This benchmark set consists of 426 instances, i.e., argumentation frameworks (AFs) [3] in apx format, obtained from translating instances from assumptionbased argumentation (ABA) [1] to AFs. The ABA benchmark is detailed in [2] and contains 680 ABA frameworks generated via a random generation model with several parameters. In particular, the ABA benchmark set includes cyclic and acyclic ABA fra...

متن کامل

Argumentation-Based Negotiation? Negotiation-Based Argumentation!

We design a protocol for two autonomous negotiating agents to incorporate Dung-style argumentation into an ongoing bargaining dialogue. Previous approaches considered bargaining and Dung-Style Argumentation as separated components, we show that intertwining these approaches increases the agents scope of action. In our framework the acceptance of an argument or attack uttered by self-interested ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2293-734X', '0824-2577']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i1.7215